Cause or Effect?

Discussion on Peterborough United only.

Moderators: ashman, poshnipper

Post Reply
JohnC
Posts: 907
Joined: 31 May 2011, 21:48

Cause or Effect?

Post by JohnC » 10 Jan 2020, 23:43

Alan Swann’s article in the PET ‘Peterborough United Can Win Promotion This Season if Fergie Can Fix Certain Problems’ touches on issues I’ve highlighted elsewhere in ‘First Quarter Report’ and ‘Half-term Report’. The most worrying was, and is, the dearth of goal-scorers throughout the team. From having only four goal-scorers in the first eleven games (as opposed to ten at the same stage last season), at the half-way stage, we had twelve outfield players with significant playing time combining for a net total of three goals.

In the last six League One games, Toney has three goals, Eisa has one and Maddison has none no one else has scored at the right end, of course.

To be successful, a return of four goals in six games would require a better defence than ours. (Swann neglected to point out that only the bottom six teams have conceded more goals than PUFC.)

The question is: to what extent is the current dearth of goals attributable to the form of the goal-scoring trio or the almost laughable inability of their team-mates to find the net at the right end?

Put simply: how difficult is it to defend against Posh if –- with Eisa subbed off or not starting -- you can double up on Toney and Maddison and challenge the others to beat you? What this can look like in specific situations was evident in the recent defeat to Doncaster. Trailing by two goals (soon to become three) in the 63rd. minute, the manager replaced Eisa and Ward, who have scored this season, with Boyd and Jones, who haven’t. There may be times when this personnel change might be appropriate, but not, perhaps, when chasing three goals in half-an-hour. With only the goal-power of Kent and Reed to back them up, Toney and Maddison unsurprisingly had no joy. Now every unsuccessful long-shot by Maddison is one fewer pass that might be directed to Toney and Eisa.

Maybe the introduction of Taylor and Brown will change everything, but that in itself looks like a businessman’s response – spend money, add personnel – rather than a coach’s one.

Meanwhile, we have a slim margin for error, and its name is Ivan Toney. It would be wholly unsurprising if he were to falter under a combination of injury, suspension, loss of form and general attritional fatigue: Eisa and Maddison don’t exactly have his back when the going gets tough.

User avatar
bristleposh
Posts: 29252
Joined: 10 Jun 2007, 09:14
Location: LDub

Re: Cause or Effect?

Post by bristleposh » 10 Jan 2020, 23:54

One of those prolific goalscorers last season was O'Hara but nobody seems to want him back, I personally would
When you are dead, you don't know you're dead.
It's difficult only for the others.
It's the same when you are stupid

User avatar
Brianposh
Posts: 9638
Joined: 06 May 2005, 13:13
Location: Within sight and sound of London Road.

Re: Cause or Effect?

Post by Brianposh » 11 Jan 2020, 00:52

bristleposh wrote:
10 Jan 2020, 23:54
One of those prolific goalscorers last season was O'Hara but nobody seems to want him back, I personally would
No, :cry: thank you Nick. "The Statue".
'Fear is the path to the dark side. Fear leads to anger. Anger leads to hate. Hate leads to suffering'.
'No! try not. Do, or do not. There is no try.'

Elder Statesman of Message Boards and Oldie Lifetime Achievement Award.

Post Reply